Thursday, June 7, 2012

BLOGS

This chapter bounces from topic to topic. From how the word "do" meaning nothing, but being applied as an action that holds no concrete meaning, to the usage in -ing and how it  turns a noun into a verb.It goes on to talk about who the originaters of language are and gives most credit to the Celtics. It also goes on to talk about what language did what in terms of how writing was scriptured and how celtified English only came into history by accident.
On page 15 he makes a simple note in stating, " this leaves us with a simple fact about what happens when language comes together, they mix" (15) this reminds me of how we in common english mix and match our words.We coin, borrow, and turn nouns into verbs by using conversion which he also spoke about. Throughout time we have taken words that connected them to food (sushi, pretzel, croissant) and made it common to say things like hoover, xerox and google to describe actions. Its interesting to see these ideas come alive in a seperate work, and he seems to be very passionate about his feelings about all of it.
One thing that I couldnt understand was why the author seemed to have such a love hate relationship with the word do.More hate actually. He was going on and on about it with such conviction, yet he was able to show the word wasnt solely limited to English. He talks about how the ing constitutes for the act of doing but attaches it to a noun and that goes back to the previous paragragh. Still the tone which he uses to discuss this is one that gives a genuine distaste for it.Perhaps this isnt a concept that can be explained in readings, but more a tone that the author set in how he explains language This chapter expressed how some languages don't pick up words from others, but some language grammar is influenced by earlier forms of language from different places. He then introduces the vikings. He talks about the shift in personal and impersonal gender, how last names change in terms of added endings.He goes back to the Celts and the word do. He relates ideals in language to African languages and talks about the level of difficulty with the clicks.(121) It reminds me about when we learned about  how we use our mouths to make certain sounds like in the video in our second power point. What I'm still not grasping is what his objective is in this book. Its not an easy read at all and I just don't understand what exactly what were supposed to grasp. Its just a bunch of random history mixed with his opinions about everything and some examples to back him up.